From: Quality management and innovation: new insights on a structural contingency framework
Hypothesis | Relationship | β | Significance |
---|---|---|---|
1 | SQM → INN | 0.491 | Significant |
2 | tQM → INN | 0.054 | Not significant |
3 | SQM → tQM | 0.489 | Significant |
4 | tQM → SQM | 0.490 | Significant |
5 | SQM X OS → INN | 0.151 | Not significant |
6 | tQM X OS → INN | 0.891 | Significant |
7 | SQM X OT → INN | −0.518 | Significant |
8 | tQM X OT → INN | −0.247 | Not significant |
9 | SQM X ME → INN | −0.834 | Not significant |
10 | tQM X ME → INN | 0.219 | Significant |